The Lindfield Preservation SocietyFounded 1961Promoting and encouraging the preservation and development of the village |
|
|
|
John Jesson assisted by Neil Kerslake, monitors all planning applications that relate to property within the Lindfield parishes. Readers may be interested to read John's recent review of specific matters of interest to the SocietyThe Central Area Planning Committee followed the recommendations of Planning Officers and refused permission for the revised proposals to demolish Littlecote and redevelop the site. The dominance of the new building and its impact on the Conservation Area were the main grounds. In reality there could be no other in the light of the previous appeal decision although some councillors voiced their dislike of demolishing Littlecote. It must still be regarded as likely that there will be yet another revised proposal. The developer may go to appeal. We will continue to follow this. Revised plans for the King Edward Hall extension were the subject of a rather acrimonious public meeting with representatives of the Hall Management Committee. Although it was billed as a chance to input views, it was pretty clear that the Committee had no intention to amend the plans they presented. Although the Preservation Society and immediate neighbours were well represented, the meeting was poorly attended by residents of the village at large and can not be considered as meaningful consultation. Our concerns are that although the lime by the twitten is now retained as a feature of the plans, the Old Fire Station is still to be demolished. The Hall Management Committee has failed to realise that the Planning Officer wrote his report to District Councillors on the previous application in terms that could have provided a satisfactory brief to their architect. The Parish Council have apparently been informed of a stay of execution for the red phone kiosk by the Bent Arms. This is welcome news. In the meantime we have written to DCMS asking for the kiosk to be listed. BT Payphones have been informed. A letter of complaint has been written to MSDC about the "farmyard" gates at the SE corner of Town Common. This echoes concerns made by residents of West View. A reply states that the Parish Council agreed to their installation as a measure necessary to prevent unauthorised access. The reply also suggests that other measures such as lockable timber or steel drop posts would not be sufficient. It is proposed that the gates, which are galvanised, will be painted black. This situation is far from satisfactory and will require further action on our part. We have supported MSDC in taking enforcement action to replace the wooden fencing at Old School Court with walls and railings more in keeping with the buildings. Our views were read verbatim to the Central Area Planning Committee. We will be seeking confirmation that work at Manor House is within that granted permission. Planning procedures are being changed and the Society will need to makes its views known also to District Councillors in order to ensure that problematic applications come before the Central Area Planning Committee. In future the number of objections will not determine this. John Jesson, 2 January 2003 |
After the long campaign to get our proper postal addresses recognised by Royal Mail, we have another fight on our hands in Lindfield as the Post Office has confirmed its intention to close two local branches including the one located at Cloughs in Sunte Avenue. Such experienced campaigners have no intention of allowing the Post Office to have an easy ride on this one and are determined to continue the fight. In addition our Deputy Chairman, Michael Anstey, is working with the Haywards Heath Society to examine the feasibility of mounting a campaign to ensure continuity of at least one of the post offices, possibly by forming a non-profit provident society to operate one of the branches under a new contract with the Post Office. A similar approach has been successfully undertaken in Horsted Keynes and Whitemans Green. This latest post office campaign remains very much a live issue. Watch out for items in the Middy about it as the story continues to unfold. Alan Gomme, Post Office Rescue Campaign |
Traffic management in Lindfield has been a major and indeed growing issue over many years. It has both physical and environmental aspects and also political implications. The latter have played an overriding part in traffic management as the funding is from the WSCC: for these funds there are widely competing claims and those parts of the county where there has been strong local conviction much has been achieved, attracting large proportions of the scarce funding available. Thus in areas such as Cuckfield, Ditchling, Keymer & Ringmer, genuine and far reaching traffic mitigation measures have been secured, largely through determined local action. This has not happened in Lindfield for a variety of reasons, including the fact that Lindfield is regarded as part of Haywards Heath and there has been little organised effort. The opportunity open to the rejuvenated Society for the Preservation of Lindfield is for us to insist that the Lindfield Parish Council's proposed traffic survey be a holistic study of the issue, leading to a comprehensive and coherent attack on the problem: if this opportunity is not seized, it calls into question the claims of the Society to represent conservation when traffic may be the fundamental and ultimate cause of its depredation. A holistic survey would consider all internal problems within the village boundaries including flow and management problems on village road networks and the external factors "outside the box" wherein extraneous traffic, both heavy lorries and cars, use the village streets, specially High Street, Lewes Road and Portsmouth Lane as conduits to reach more distant locations, when alternative routes are identifiable. Any traffic management study awarded to external consultants should have regard to both aspects; otherwise recommendations or solutions put forward may be unacceptably sub-optimal, thereby leading to confusion & frustration. It should include external traffic matters impinging on Lindfield's internal road network and it should also include a detailed assessment of ebbs & flows, volumes, speeds, noise & weight factors. The recommended action should take account of measures introduced elsewhere such as speed limits (a 20 mph limit is suggested in urban Lindfield), cameras, courtesy electronic notices, chicanes, quiet road surfaces, weight controls and signage (eg 2028/310 junctions at Ardingly & West Common and A272/B2111 at Scaynes Hill). The Society's management committee believes that members and villagers regard traffic as an important and relevant issue. It believes that it should endeavour to work in partnership with Lindfield Parish Council. The society's management committee is considering its contribution to the funding of a traffic survey. Your views on the traffic survey and its funding would be appreciated. Peter Lawson, Chairman | ![]() | ||
Webmaster: Malcolm Wykes |